<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex2 :: Frameworks</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com/2006/05/12/flex2-frameworks/</link>
	<description>Components are the building blocks of our Universe, that is why I make them!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: teoti.graphix</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com/2006/05/12/flex2-frameworks/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com/2006/05/12/flex2-frameworks/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>J,

User Interface Application Framework is what my mind came up with when trying to describe what I am doing. Just like if you asked someone 200 years ago what a telephone was, they would look at you and say &quot;What?!&quot;.

There is a way to control an over all application user interface that goes beyond a single Flex Application. THis is what I am aiming at. The &quot;desktop&quot; word seems to be the only way I can portray my intentions with this new component set.

Why is Windows so used? Windows is usable and people know it. But as of now, you never needed such an abstraction to get the Flash Player to need such a 'framework' to hold applications. Now you do.

Peace, Mike

PS, This is just the way 'I' am visualizing the solution, there are many others that are waiting to be discovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J,</p>
<p>User Interface Application Framework is what my mind came up with when trying to describe what I am doing. Just like if you asked someone 200 years ago what a telephone was, they would look at you and say &#8220;What?!&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is a way to control an over all application user interface that goes beyond a single Flex Application. THis is what I am aiming at. The &#8220;desktop&#8221; word seems to be the only way I can portray my intentions with this new component set.</p>
<p>Why is Windows so used? Windows is usable and people know it. But as of now, you never needed such an abstraction to get the Flash Player to need such a &#8216;framework&#8217; to hold applications. Now you do.</p>
<p>Peace, Mike</p>
<p>PS, This is just the way &#8216;I&#8217; am visualizing the solution, there are many others that are waiting to be discovered.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JigneshDodiya</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com/2006/05/12/flex2-frameworks/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com/2006/05/12/flex2-frameworks/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>Mike, Still I have some confusions regarding UIAF....More I am confused with the term Application Framwork and what you always says like Component based UIAF??

Appreciate your way of thinking simply out of Horizon..Keep it Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, Still I have some confusions regarding UIAF&#8230;.More I am confused with the term Application Framwork and what you always says like Component based UIAF??</p>
<p>Appreciate your way of thinking simply out of Horizon..Keep it Up
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
